Question 1

A case in which the contract payment was returned after the termination of the contract with a Korean company.

Accepted Answer

*Overview of the disputeThe client is an American company. The client ordered the service from a Korean company and deposited the service cost of $10000. Due to issues such as Corona in 2021, the service contract suddenly cannot be fulfilled. Since then, there has been an issue between the client and the Korean company regarding the return of the service payment. Negotiations were not carried out properly due to long-distance communication, and the Korean company refused to negotiate. The client asked our law firm to resolve the dispute under Korean law.*Review of the caseOur law firm reviewed the service contract between the client and the Korean company. We first checked the governing law and confirmed that it is possible to solve it according to Korean law. Then we went over the terms of the contract. We confirmed the responsibility of the Korean company for the failure of the contract and analyzed the possibility of winning the lawsuit. We constructed a litigation strategy by analyzing all of the emails, contracts, progress, existing judgments, and similar cases provided by the client.*Progress of the caseWe submitted a lawsuit document containing our claims to the court. On the basis of legal provisions and precedents, we insisted that all the service payments should be returned and the content was consistent and clear. The other side refuted our argument with various reasons, but we were able to cope with it easily. This was because the refutation strategy was formed in advance after sufficient review before the case proceeded. After a year of arguing, we won the case. Since then, we have forcibly executed the other party's property and returned the service payment to the client.*ConclusionA thorough review of the case was a very meaningful case. Law firm yeyul is a company that closely analyzes client cases with sufficient experience. If you have a legal dispute with a Korean company, please contact us.

Question 2

Case of Dispute Settlement of Parts Defects with Korean Companies

Accepted Answer

This case is a dispute due to defects in goods.*Overview of the incidentCompany A, a Singaporean company, ordered machine parts from B, a Korean company. The Korean company that received the order shipped the parts and sent them to Singapore. However, the parts were rusty and the Korean company was at fault. Singapore company A asked the Korean company to solve the problem, but the Korean company did not respond. Eventually, the Singapore company asked Ye&Partners to resolve the case.*A lawyer's work processingWe were commissioned by Company A and analyzed the case closely. If we proceed with the lawsuit, we assumed that we could win the case We tried to negotiate by sending mail to the other party first. If you proceed with the lawsuit, the case will proceed for one to two years. The client didn't have time, so we worked on a faster solution.Based on the contents of the case we analyzed, we sent a mail to the other party who is a Korean company. It was a written opinion containing legal analysis, legal action, and legal regulations.The negotiation table was handled by our law firm.The client visited from Singapore. The client and the other party were able to negotiate with each other, and it was conducted with the intention of reaching good results.The client and the other party made an adjustment to the details, such as the shipment date, total cost burden, etc. and the deadline because of client traveled a long distance to visit.Additionally, communication between the two parties was complicated, Because both parties included engagements, consumer time, and cost, it was a sensitive issue. The role of a lawyer in the middle was important. As a conclusion, a resolution was reached at the negotiating table that satisfied all parties, The client returned to Singapore with satisfactory results.

Korean Law Guide- Our Cases- Civil Suit

Korean Law Guide Recommended Guide